Twitter Updates
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Send Phil an e-mail
phil@philhardwick.com-
Recent Posts
Blogroll
Links of Interest
Copyright Notice
© Phil Hardwick and Phil Hardwick's Weblog, 2009-2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Phil Hardwick and Phil Hardwick's Weblog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Reflections on “context.”
“Context” is generally defined as “… the part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning.” (see thefreedictionary.com/context) Taking something out of context often changes a meaning entirely or it can cause one to form opinions that are sometimes not justified. Failing to consider historical or setting context can do just that. Two examples of context came to me this morning.
The first appeared in a Kindle sample book , Jar City, A Reykjavik Thriller, authored by Arnaldur Indridason and Bernard Scudder. In one scene, the main character, a detective, slaps his daughter in the face. I almost deleted the sample at that moment because I consider that to be an offensive and unacceptable in today’s world. But I was not reading about today’s world, and it was not a novel set in the United States. I read on and considered the context. The daughter was an adult and was on drugs. I’m not saying that she deserved to be slapped, but a father slapping his daughter in the face needs to be set in context. And yes, I bought the book and am enjoying it. I discovered it by way of a Schumpeter blog in The Economist entitled Those Bloody Scandinavians – What the Nordic crime-writing boom says about globaliatiosn.
The second thought about context appeared when I went to the grocery store for a bottle of Aunt Jemima‘s syrup for the pancakes that I cook for my wife on Sunday mornings. The image of Aunt Jemima has changed with the context of the times. From racial stereotype to “modern homemaker,” depending on the context.
If you really want to get into a discussion about context, just bring up the Bible. There are numerous instances of traditions, customs and practices that are mentioned that cause consternation today. For example, should women cover their heads in worship? Read 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 for reference. Some may say that women should cover their heads, while others say look at the context. I have no interest in getting into a conversation about the subject, but I believe it is a good illustration of context.
In short, when considering controversial statements and issues, consider the context.
Share this:
Like this:
→ Leave a comment
Posted in General Comments
Tagged Arnaldur Indridason, aunt jemima, aunt jemima controversy, Bernard Scudder, context, jar city, kindle, kindle sample jar city, Scandinavian novels, taken out of context, the economist schumpeter, women cover heads in worship